After search, use << and >> links at top of page to view other pages.
Get Updates on Facebook

Steam Temperature Control

Steam temperature is one of the most challenging control loops in a power plant boiler because it is highly nonlinear and has a long dead time and time lag. Adding to the challenge, steam temperature is affected by boiler load, rate of change of boiler load, air flow rate, the combination of burners in service, and the amount of soot on the boiler tubes.

After separation from the boiler water in the drum, the steam is superheated to improve the thermal efficiency of the boiler-turbine unit. Modern boilers raise the steam temperature to around 1000F (538C), which approaches the creep (slow deformation) point of the steel making up the superheater tubing. Steam temperatures above this level, even for brief periods of time, can shorten the usable life of the boiler. Keeping steam temperature constant is also important for minimizing thermal stresses on the boiler and turbine.

Steam temperature is normally controlled by spraying water into the steam between the first and second-stage superheater to cool it down. Water injection is done in a device called an attemperator or desuperheater. The spray water comes from either an intermediate stage of the boiler feedwater pump (for reheater spray) or from the pump discharge (for superheater spray). Other methods of steam temperature control include flue gas recirculation, flue gas bypass, and tilting the angle at which the burners fire into the furnace. This discussion will focus on steam temperature control through attemperation. The designs discussed here will apply to the reheater and superheater, but only the superheater will be mentioned for simplicity.

BASIC FEEDBACK CONTROL

The simplest method for controlling steam temperature is by measuring the steam temperature at the point it exits the boiler, and changing the spray water valve position to correct deviations from the steam temperature set point (Figure 1). This control loop should be tuned for the fastest possible response without overshoot, but even then the loop will respond relatively slowly due to the long dead time and time lag of the superheater.

Simple Steam Temperature Control

Figure 1. Simple Steam Temperature Control

CASCADED STEAM TEMPERATURE CONTROL

Because of the slow response of the main steam temperature control loop, improved disturbance rejection can be achieved by implementing a secondary (inner) control loop at the desuperheater. This loop measures the desuperheater outlet temperature and manipulates the control valve position to match the desuperheater outlet temperature to its set point coming from the main steam temperature controller (Figure 2). This arrangement is called cascade control.

Cascaded Steam Temperature Controls

Figure 2. Cascaded Steam Temperature Controls

The spray water comes from upstream of the feedwater control valves, and changes in feedwater control valve position will cause changes in spray water pressure, and therefore disturb the spray water flow rate. The desuperheater outlet temperature control loop will provide a gradual recovery when this happens. If the spray water flow rate to the attemperator is measured, a flow control loop can be implemented as a tertiary inner loop to provide very fast disturbance rejection. However, in many cases spray water flow rate is not measured at the individual attemperators and this flow loop cannot be implemented.

GAIN SCHEDULING

The process dead time of the superheater increases with a decrease in boiler load because of the slower rate of steam flow at lower loads. This will have a negative impact on the stability of the main steam temperature control loop unless gain scheduling is implemented. Step tests need to be done at low, medium, and high boiler loads, and optimal controller settings calculated at each load level. A gain scheduler should be implemented to adjust the controller settings according to unit load. Because of the changing dead time and lag of the superheater, the integral and derivative times must be scheduled in addition to the controller gain.

The gain of the desuperheater outlet temperature loop will be affected greatly by steam flow rate. Changes in steam flow rate will affect the amount of cooling obtained from a given spray water flow rate. Less cooling will occur at high steam flow rates. In addition, at high loads the pressure differential between the feedwater pump discharge and steam pressure will be lower, reducing the spray flow rate for a given spray valve position (assuming the absence of a flow control loop on the desuperheater spray flow). To compensate for these nonlinear behavior, controller gain scheduling should be implemented on the desuperheater outlet temperature loop too. Fugure 3 shows the basic design of the steam temperature controller gain scheduler (cascaded controller is not shown for clarity). Similar to tuning the main steam temperature control loop, step tests must be done at low, medium, and high boiler loads to design the gain scheduler.

Steam Temperature Controller Gain Scheduling

Figure 3. Steam Temperature Controller Gain Scheduling

FEEDFORWARD CONTROL

During boiler load ramps in turbine-following mode, the firing rate is changed first, followed by a change in steam flow rate a while later. With the increase in steam flow rate lagging behind fuel flow rate, the additional heat in the furnace can lead to large deviations in steam temperature. To compensate for this, a feedforward control signal from the boiler master to the steam temperature controller can be implemented.

The feedforward can use the rate of change in fuel flow or one of several other derived measurements to bias the steam temperature controller’s output. In essence, when boiler load is increasing, the spray water flow rate will be increased to counter the excess heat being transferred to the steam, and vice versa. The feedforward can be calibrated by measuring the extent of steam temperature deviation during load ramps.

 

Stay tuned!
Jacques Smuts – Author of the book Process Control for Practitioners

 

16 Responses to “Steam Temperature Control”

  • Karthi:

    Excellent effort.lucid description makes a great read.You can touch upon the integral windup problem frequent in STC. I would like to see you write about the boiler-turbine co-ordinated control.
    Regards
    Karthi

  • Karthi,
    You bring up a good point. When the desuperheater outlet approaches saturation temperature, the inner loop should be blocked from adding more spray. The outer loop’s controller should use external reset feedback to prevent integral windup. If this is not possible, its integral term should be blocked under any one of these conditions:
    – When the inner loop’s controller output is at 0% or 100% (this normally happens automatically)
    – When the inner loop’s output is blocked because of proximity to saturation, as described in Zeke’s note below.

    I have placed boiler-turbine coordinated control on my to-do list for the blog.

    Thanks for your inputs.
    Stay tuned!
    Jacques

  • Allan Zadiraka:

    Jacques

    In actual practice, you cannot permit the desuperheater outlet temperature reach saturation temperature since you have no idea of the quality of the fluid other that it could be all saturated liquid, all saturated vapor or some mixture of the two states. Unfortunately, turbines and superheater tubes do not like water. The spray flow must be limited to a temperature above saturation temperature for the pressure, typically 20 degrees F. This delta is needed to account for thermocouple accuracy and drift as well as the thermocouple/thermowell time response. In the few cases where it is necessary to spray to saturation, a simple temperature based limit cannot be used.

    zeke

  • Imran Ahmed:

    Hi ! It is is very informative detail. I am facing a problem at 210 MW Steam Turbine with 640 t/hr Babcock boiler.

    Recently Emerson OVation DCS has been installed as a Retrofit job. Main steam temperature cannot be increased from 480 C , also Air restriction is there, Air heaters are clear, air damper ( FDF dampers open almost 100%) but still air deficiency is there.

    Can you give any particular reason on control side for low main steam temperature.

    regards,

    Imran

  • Imran,
    From the information you gave me it is not possible to tell exactly what the problem is.
    Are your measurements and controller outputs ranged exactly the same as they were before the retrofit?

    Jacques

  • SAJEESH:

    hi….

    I didnt get the cascade control theory basics….i have to control the main steam temperature around 480 degree.Output of PID is limited to 0 to 100 corresponding to 4 to 20 mA for control valve.so i f i give this value (0 to 100) to inner loop as setpoint to de superheater how the cascade controller works.Please provide me more detailss…

  • Sajeesh,
    The temperature controller’s output has to be rescaled from its standard 0-100% to match the range of the spray flow controller’s set point (or process variable).

    Some controllers (e.g. Invensys Fox I/A) allow you to rescale the output directly, while other controllers (e.g. Honeywell Experion) do the scaling for you automatically. Yet other systems (e.g. Emerson Ovation) require you to place a scaling block between the two controllers.

    Jacques

  • Ravi Mishra:

    Dear Sir,

    During the Turbine follow mode operation its seems that, the main steam temperature have large deviations during the ramp up and ramp down, even with feed forward loop is implemented (from steam flow/BLI) because The firing rate is changed first, followed by the change in steam flow rate.
    So how can we generate the feed forward signal (logic) from the fuel flow or boiler master demand to compensate this deviation? Can you give the that logic which can implemented to reduce this problem?

  • Ravi, there are several designs for this feedforward of which some seem to work better than others depending on the particular situation, boiler design, fuel type, etc. Some use fuel flow, or its rate of change, some use air flow, or its rate of change. Others use a combination of steam and fuel flow that alters spray flow based on the relative difference between fuel and steam flows. I recommend that you look at Sam Dukelow’s book, The Control of Boilers. It is an excellent source of technical information on boiler controls.
    – Jacques

  • Siby:

    This is slightly off topic but still relevant question for Control engineers at a time when Advanced process control schemes are becoming more prevalent. Is the use of a Model predictive controller to provide set-points to the spray control valves for steam temperature control a cost effective approach?

  • I did a comprehensive study for the Electric Power Research Institute (EPRI) on the adoption of Advanced Process Control / Model-Predictive Control (APC/MPC) in power plants. Compared to the refining, and chemical industries, the power industry lags far behind in using APC/MPC. On the flip side, the power industry is the forerunner with utilizing complex DCS-based control strategies. APC/MPC will do a fine job of controlling steam temperature, especially if you control the burners individually, instead of just one common fuel demand. Excess air, spraywater, burner tilts/recirc air/bypass dampers should all be used simultaneously as control elements. ABB, Neuco, Invensys, and probably others, have reported successes with APC on boiler plants. The power industry lacks the skills to implement and maintain APC, and the cost benefits are just not there in many cases (except perhaps for environmental controls).
    – Jacques

  • Siby:

    I read the article and found it to give an objective assessment on APC in power plants. Nicely highlights the challenges involved in making APC’s more acceptable.
    Siby

  • H.B.R:

    Hi, I read your article impressively.
    I would like to ask you if it’s possible to control steam temperature using characteristic curve.
    In the plant where I worked, the main and re-heat steam temperature control loop is cascade without feedforward demand. At first, the main and re-heat steam temperatures swinged and it affected MW and steam pressure. To avoid that, we applied charecteristic curve(o.g f(x) function in ovation) opening TCV position more than PID manipulated position to compensate the dead-time(time delay). Actually, it was the idea of my boss and I’m curious if it’s proper to use a characteristic curve for steam temperature control.

  • H.B.R. – Characterizers are used to compensate for some type of nonlinear process behavior, or to obtain a nonlinear control action where one is needed. A characterizer can be used very effectively in feedforward control where the relationship between the disturbance and the required compensating control action is nonlinear. It sounds like this is what your boss did, even though the design might have been different from normal. If there is a strong relationship between (e.g.) fuel input and spray valve position required to maintain reheat steam temperature, using a feedforward with a characterizer would be appropriate. However, you will likely also require some degree of feedback control to compensate for other variables such as different burners in use, boiler sooting, etc.

  • Donald:

    Dear Jacques,

    Firstly, I cannot thank you enough for this incredibly educational and useful website. With regards to the main steam temperature to desuperheater outlet temperature cascade arrangement, is the inner loop here typically many times faster than the master loop? Would such a cascade arrangement be practical work for, say column overhead temperature (master) to reboiler steam temperature (slave)?

  • Donald – On the steam-temperature controlled boilers with that I have dealt with (mostly in power plants) the inner loop was typically *not* many times faster than the outer loop, but in most cases it was still fast enough to make a difference. Disturbance rejection improves roughly at the ratio of outer loop / inner loop response time, provided the disturbance is first noticeable at the inner loop. So even a 2:1 ratio may make cascade control desirable.
    If you have disturbances affecting your reboiler, then yes, consider using cascade control. Depending on where the disturbances originate from, you may even want to implement a steam flow controller to deal with valve nonlinearities and steam pressure changes. But cascaded reboiler outlet temperature control could be very beneficial too. Again, it depends where your disturbances or nonlinearities show up first.

Leave a Reply

The Book for Practitioners